[ITNOG] Genoa Question

[Marco Zacchello]

I agree on landing point diversity .
Here the matter is about to address single point of failure , get better
latency and new routes to Central Europe .

Yes in Italy power is more expensive, but developing landing stations do
not mean building big Datacenter with tens or hundreds of MW. And yes
Genova cannot support a large footprint DC.
Same as Milan, who has plenty of capacity (current and planned) , and a lot
of new investor and Datacenters planned , is few milliseconds far from
Genova .


So make sense to have a CLS development in Genova and maybe Trieste . And
for Genova is already happening.


My 2 cents


Il giorno sab 25 gen 2025 alle 12:01 Roderick Beck <
roderick.beck@networksourcing.net> ha scritto:

> Trieste is diverse to Marseille and Grenoble, and has very low latency to
> Austria,Switzerland, Germany, Northern Europe, etc. I believe the harbor is
> big and deep enough to accommodate many cables.
>
> We see the same pattern happening everywhere. Landing point
> diversification. On the US everything used to land in New York and New
> Jersey. Then the cables headed South to land at Virginia Beach, Virginia.
> Now several cables are using Myrtle Beach, California.
>
> On the European side mostAtlantic  cables landed in the UK. Then France,
> Denmark, and finally Spain and Portugal.
>
> A single Internet gateway for the Mediterranean is an invitation to
> disaster. The OTTs know this and they apparently care about resiliency than
> the stodgy PTTs.
>
> -R.
>
> --
> Roderick Beck
> Network Capacity Sourcing - Broker
> Mobile: 00-36-70-605-5144.
> Landline: 1-908-452-8183
> Email: roderick.beck@networksourcing.net
> Telegram: @RoderickBeck
> Tallinn & Budapest.
>
>
> --
> Mailing list info: http://lists.itnog.it/listinfo/itnog
>
-------------- parte successiva --------------
Un allegato HTML è stato rimosso...
URL: <http://lists.itnog.it/pipermail/itnog/attachments/20250127/dfc5a717/attachment.htm>